MILITARY IMMIGRATION FROM GERMAN LANDS
1776-1783
s the last German emigrants were on
their way to Philadelphia and
Baltimore in 1775, the transport of
another type of Germans was under discussion
in London. Once the British government
had resolved to use force against the
American rebels, it became clear to military
as well as political leaders that the British
army was too small to subdue the rebellious
colonists. Various schemes were considered.
In view of the considerable number of
German settlers in several of the colonies,
proposals were made to hire Russian troops.
Major General Henry Clinton endorsed this
project: "We must be reinforced, not with
Germans (I fear they will desert)," but with
Russians whom he called "my friends" and
since they had "no language but their own:
they cannot desert." However, according to
the report of the British envoy in Berlin,
attempts to obtain 20,000 men from
Empress Catherine failed, in part because
Frederick II of Prussia intervened.
As soon as the British interest in foreign
soldiers became known, former officers
who had been idle since the Seven
Years' War offered their service to recruit
individuals for British service. In the summer
of 1775 the Hannoverian colonel
Albrecht von Scheither obtained a business
contract for signing up 2,000 men at £10 a
head. He hired fellow ex-officers as
recruiters but due to simultaneous solicitations
for other armies and the massive
recruiting from 1776 on by German princes
to fill the ranks of units needed for their
treaties with Britain, Scheither never
reached his goal. By late September 1776 he
had gathered 1,738 men, who were accepted
by Colonel William Faucitt, the British officer
in charge of inspecting foreign units.¹ When
German princes later concluded treaties to
make entire regiments available, such
private military business were no longer
needed. Besides some former officers,
looking desperately for income from such
business, at times turned out to be less than
trustworthy. Ex-major Heinrich Emmanuel
Lutterloh, whose earlier plans to find settlers
for East Florida and Nova Scotia had not
materialized, reportedly had permission
from Count Johann Ludwig of Wittgenstein
to recruit men for British service but he
suddenly vanished, leaving debts behind
amounting to 7,292 gulden.²
Despite some apprehensions, the
British had begun early in 1775 to look for
auxiliary troops from German principalities.
Indeed, offers had come from the count of
Hanau in August and from the duke of
Braunschweig-Luneburg in September 1775
before any official British move was made,
prompting Edmund Burke of the opposition
in parliament to remark that German princes
had already "snuffed the cadaverous taint of
lucrative war." Colonel Faucitt in Hannover
was given the task of negotiating the treaty
with Braunschweig and then proceeding to
Kassel to find out if the Hessian government
could be persuaded to furnish troops for
generous subsidies and a levy per man.
Although the landgrave of Hessen-Kassel
had not sought such a contract, the British
conditions were enticing enough for the
Hessian negotiator, Martin Ernst von
Schlieffen, to offer 10-12,000 men, twice as
many as Faucitt had been asked to secure.
The treaty was concluded in February but
A
Military Immigration______________
back-dated to January 15, 1776, to extend
the subsidy and cause the landgrave to
speed up the mobilization of about 12,500
soldiers. Three other German states,
Waldeck (750 men), Braunschweig (4,000)
and Hessen-Hanau (900), signed similar
treaties. By early February the British were
assured of more than 18,000 officers and
men.
Toward the end of the year an agreement
was reached with Margrave Alexander
of Ansbach-Bayreuth for a force of 1,160
men. Finally in September 1777 the duke of
Anhalt-Zerbst also concluded a subsidy
treaty for a contingent of the same size. In
1777 the number of soldiers in several
treaties was revised upwards and as late as
1781/82, 2,988 replacements were furnished
by Ansbach-Bayreuth, Anhalt-Zerbst
and Hessen-Kassel to make up for losses in
the forces.³
The subsidy treaties were no secret
undertakings. The English and German versions
of the ones involving Hessen-Kassel,
Hessen-Hanau and Braunschweig-Luneburg
were openly published in Frankfurt
and Leipzig in 1776. As they were debated
in Parliament in London, James Luttrell, a
member of the opposition who had himself
spent many years in America, rose on
February 25, 1776, to remind his colleagues
of the presence of many Germans in the
colonies: "I apprehend that ministry now
apply to Parliament for seventeen thousand
Germans to send to America. Good God, for
what end? To enslave a hundred and fifty
thousand of their own countrymen, many of
whom fled from tyrants to seek our protection."
Luttrell then gave a vivid description
of the major German settlements and added
to his account of the American Germans
"that the encouragement for them to quit
their own country and become settlers in
America was so great, so very great, that the
German princes found it absolutely necessary
to make it death by their laws to carry
any more of them out, and the Palatine ships
that used so frequently to convey them have
of late years ceased to arrive at the ports of
our colonies." His speech culminated in
remarks expressing fears that were shared
by many other Englishmen familiar with the
scene:
I think it an excellent opportunity for
our hired troops to desert, because
they will most likely be offered
lands, and protection. These warlike
transports we are to fit out may then
be considered as good as the Palatine
ships for peopling America with
Germans.4
A few days earlier, the Saxon envoy in
The Hague, J. P. I. Dubois, in a report to
Dresden voiced the same opinion about the
subsidy treaties "as a new emigration for the
benefit of the colonies since you can assume
ahead of time that these troops will be
lost."5
In early January 1776 the Philadelphia
Staatsbote printed a letter which Henrich
Miller, its editor and an ardent supporter of
the revolutionary cause, had received from
Germany. The writer consoled his countrymen
in America about German soldiers to
be sent over in the crown's service by
asserting that once in America they would
throw away their arms and take up the
ploughs. It was not until the May 7th issue
that Miller informed his readers of the news
of the actual hiring of these troops to which
he added the question: "Oh George! Are
these your messengers of peace?"6 As soon as
copies of the first subsidiary treaties had
reached Philadelphia in May, Congress
began to debate whether to offer special
enticements to Germans willing to desert.
—34—
_______________________Wust
On June 1st the first soldiers from
Hanau and Braunschweig landed at Quebec
where they witnessed the withdrawal of
American troops who had besieged the city.
Meanwhile crack units of the Hessian army
had left Kassel on May 11th for Karlshafen
where they were loaded on boats for the
journey down the Weser to Bremerlehe.
After inspection by Col. Faucitt, they were
taken to Gravesend and transferred unto
chartered vessels which sailed in convoys
across the Atlantic. On August 17th they
arrived at Sandy Hook on Staten Island.
Within a few days the Hessians were
involved in successful combat on Long
Island, and a month later New York was in
British hands, leaving the recently arrived
German soldiers with rather negative
impressions of the American rebels.7
Immediate attempts were nonetheless
made to attract Hessians over to the
American side. As soon as the debarkation
of the Hessians was known, Congress had
passed a resolution to accept foreigners
from the royal armies and to grant them fifty
acres of land each if they wanted to become
citizens of the new nation. German versions
of the offer, signed by John Hancock, were
dashed off to George Washington for distribution.
Copies were soon found scattered on
roads or as wrappers with tobacco inside— a
special lure suggested by Benjamin Franklin.
The Hessian commander in his report to
Kassel cited this as typical treachery and as
an example of the "upside-down" thinking
of the rebels.
The widely expected defection of
German soldiers did not occur in 1776. The
first units shipped to America were largely
composed of professional soldiers, many of
whom had been in service for years.
Moreover, the hasty withdrawal of rebel
forces from the St. Lawrence and the initial
success of the British and Hessian armies in
the New York area would have been discouraging
even if some soldiers might have
wanted to get away once they were on
American soil. The number of desertions
recorded by the Hessian command remained
low: 66 in 1776 and 109 in 1777.8
In order to fulfill their treaty obligations,
the principalities involved had to
recruit many young men who were not their
subjects. Hessen-Kassel was given permission
by several neighboring states and imperial
cities to enlist within their jurisdictions.
Recruiting methods in the 18th century were
widely known for their complete disregard
for the person. There are contemporary
sources describing tricks and bribery. Many
were seduced with strong drinks to bring
them into the recruiting station. One of the
victims, Johann Gottfried Seume, a nineteen-
year-old university student, found himself
surrounded by a "human medley," fellows
from such distant places as Jena, Vienna,
Hannover, Gotha, Wurzburg and
Meiningen.9 After his return to Germany
Seume became a well-known poet and the
story of his service in America received
much attention. There were some men who
had volunteered to escape something in
their lives. Others did so in order to give
themselves to the adventure of seeing the
New World. After the arrival of the new
units, the Hessian headquarters in America
sent an assessment of the additional, largely
non-Hessian recruits back to Kassel: "Many
of them may have intended to take advantage
of the chance of free passage to this
country, and finally to quit Europe. They
would have had to work about four years to
pay the cost of their crossing." While such
reports echoed the statements made in
Parliament and in diplomatic circles at the
—35—
Military Immigration______________
outset of the use of subsidiary troops, there
is little proof that there were many soldiers
who had obvious plans for settling in the
colonies. Nor is there any record of encounters
with relatives in the first year.
The main impetus for defection came
from defeated units which found themselves
as prisoners of war in the hands of the rebel
army. For Hessian troops, of whom 868
rank-and-file soldiers had been captured at
Trenton on December 26, 1776, captivity
meant their first real contact with the
American Germans. After they were
marched to Pennsylvania the Americans
decided to farm them out for work instead
of keeping them in guarded camps.
According to detailed lists which have been
preserved, 397 Hessians were released
between September 10 and November 20,
1777, to work for farmers and craftsmen.
Most of their temporary employers were
Germans in and around Lancaster, Reading,
York and Lebanon. A dozen men, most of
them from the artillery company, were sent
to the Cornwall Iron Works where they
became instrumental in improving the quality
of cannons produced for the American
army. Later on thirty-nine prisoners of the
Hessian regiment von Knyphausen were
sent to Mount Hope in New Jersey to work
for ironmaster Joh. Jacob Faesch. They had
evidently agreed to being hired as indentured
servants to escape the awful treatment
they had experienced in Philadelphia jails.
Printed appeals to desert were increasingly
effective among the still active units
as they had more time to observe the obvious
prosperity of the local populations, both
in the rebellious colonies and in loyal
Canada. The American general Israel
Putnam issued a proclamation at White
Plains in November 1777, urging the
Germans to abandon the British cause and
"lead useful and peaceful lives among the
free men of America."10 Among the auxiliary
units in the province of New York at that
time were regiments from Braunschweig
which comprised numerous soldiers from
other German lands. The official rolls list
men from Brandenburg, Wurttemberg,
Hessen-Darmstadt, the bishopric of Mainz,
Alsace, the Palatinate, Thuringia and
Saxony and many other areas. Individual
desertions began in considerable numbers
late in 1777 after the battle of Saratoga.11
The British retreat from Philadelphia in
1778 was accompanied by the defection of
more than 235 Hessians from their units
during the march. Reporting to the
Landgrave in July, General von Knyphausen
referred to the heavy desertion:
The cause of this, so far as I can
guess, is that printed leaflets were
spread amongst the men in a secret
manner, in which each man who
would desert and settle here in the
country was promised a quantity of
land, two horses, one cow, and similar
encouragements. Also those who
were exchanged from captivity have
made such glowing descriptions of
the regions there, and how well they
have been received....12
In predominantly German communities
in Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia
individual soldiers found acceptance by
local people once the prejudice against
"Hessians" was overcome through personal
contact. In many places, particularly in the
western parts, deserters were harbored by
their established countrymen. Although the
saying "Du verdammter Hess" (you damned
Hessian) remained alive for a long time in
German settlements, the common soldiers
often overcame the barriers. For the offi-
—36—
______________________Wust
cers, who almost to a man showed no inclination
to change sides, there remained the
impression of enmity, which was often
mutual. Hessian lieutenant Andreas
Wiederholt found most of the American
Germans "of the lowest class." Even those
who offered hospitality "remain raw and
unrefined German peasants. They are
steeped in the American idea of Liberty but
know nothing of what liberty really is and
are therefore worse than all others and
almost unbearable." Army captain Johann
Ewald described his experience in Maryland
with less bias: "This region is well cultivated,
the inhabitants are mostly Germans but have
a very bad opinion of us." Ewald then
mentions his encounter with an old woman
sitting in front of her home whom he asked
for a glass of water. She answered in a true
Palatine dialect:
I shall give you water, but I must
also ask you, what have we done to
you? You Germans come here to
ruin us and to chase us from our
homes. We have heard enough of
your plundering, you will do the
same here as you did in New York
and New Jersey, but you will be punished
for it.13
One spectacular example of solidarity
of local Germans with a soldier from
Braunschweig in the early days of the war
has been recorded in a diary and in letters
preserved in the army archives. The musketeer
Andreas Hasselmann deserted from an
outpost of his regiment near Quebec in June
1776. After he was captured, the commander,
General von Riedesel, ordered his execution
by firing squad. The order was well
publicized to set an example for others who
might have the same intention. Fourteen
German-born residents of Quebec intervened
on Hasselmann's behalf. They signed
an appeal which was delivered by one of
them directly to Riedesel on August 27th.
Two days later the general informed the
Quebec Germans of having granted a pardon
"although he deserved death." In order
to impress the troops, though, the entire execution
ceremony was staged on September
4th. Hasselmann's pardon was read only
moments before the firing. He was freed
from arrest and served with his regiment
until the end of the war, when he received a
discharge in June 1783 to remain in Canada.14
In 1778 the Hessian command tried to
use executions as a deterrent for others. In
August a soldier was hanged for leaving an
outpost and in October another one who had
left his unit in Newport was executed. Later
some Hessian commanders commuted the
death sentences of other deserters to running
the gauntlet, but in Canadian garrisons
Indians were sent after deserters with orders
to bring back their scalps the next day. In
March 1782, three Hessians caught beyond
the lines were shot dead. Although the
Margrave of Ansbach-Bayreuth had instructed
the commander August Valentin
von Voit to replace the death penalty with
imposing the gauntlet "since I want no soldier
to be sentenced to death," the desertions
became so frequent that in 1780 members
of the Ansbach troops were executed
by firing squads in order to set a warning
example.15
Meanwhile the American endeavors to
lure Germans of the conventional army over
to their side continued. Since many soldiers
were afraid to join the rebel armies outright,
special offers were made to exempt them
from military service. On February 3, 1781,
when the main theater of the war appeared
to be in Virginia, Governor Thomas
Jefferson issued a proclamation in Rich-
—37—
Military Immigration______________
mond which expressed the true feelings of
the American cause more than any other
appeal to the subsidiary troops. While referring
to the earlier resolution of the
Continental Congress, Jefferson stressed the
willingness of the states "to extend the protection
of the Laws to all those who should
settle among them of whatsoever nation or
religion they might be." He did not conceal
the feelings of the revolutionary movement
about the disgraceful "Foreign Princes" and
their "habit of selling the blood of their people
for money. Besides promises made by
Congress to those who decided to stay "in a
Country where many of their Friends and
relations were already happily settled," the
governor pledged to those leaving the
enemy armies in Virginia "a further donation
of two Cows, and an exemption during
the present War." If they continued to live in
the state, they were exempted from all warrelated
taxes, "and from all Militia and
Military Service.16
The British surrender at Yorktown on
October 19, 1781, was for all involved the
clear signal that the Americans—with considerable
assistance from the French—were
prevailing in this war. For several months
afterwards there were skirmishes, but
important places like Savannah, Georgia,
were still firmly in British hands. On
February 20, 1782, the rebel governor of
Georgia, John Martin, with the consent of
the Executive Council, issued a proclamation
from his temporary seat at Ebenezer in
which the state offered a piece of land of
200 acres free of any costs, a good cow and
two breeding hogs to every soldier leaving
the English service. In March the Hessian
commander, Friedrich von Porbeck, sent a
report to the ministry in Kassel with which
he enclosed a copy of the governor's proclamation
in German, "which the Rebel gener-
al Wayne has disseminated in our garrison
by slatternly women from Ebenezer."17
Colonel Alured Clarke in Savannah
wrote to his superior General Leslie that the
Hessian regiment von Knoblauch had been
stationed there too long and there were
many deserters. Leslie, in a report to
General Henry Clinton, the chief of the
royal armies, explained why he found it
necessary to withdraw the Hessian regiment:
"I am sorry to observe that when the
Hessian Troops are sent to out Posts
Desertion takes place, they being so long
here has been the means of their forming too
many connections." The "connections" were
indeed responsible for most defections.
One of them was with women, but it was
most frequently not with the "slatternly"
ones. There are numerous stories of
German soldiers, some while they were still
prisoners of war, who became attached to
local girls and their families. The records
kept by the Rev. G. C. Cöster, who served
two Hessian regiments as chaplain, contain a
number of notations of marriages to
American women who were pregnant.
Cöster cites the responsibility some soldiers
felt for mother and child.18
The use of deserters from German subsidiary
units in the American forces was a
problem because many rebel officers considered
them generally unreliable. George
Washington even thought they might cause
his own soldiers to desert whenever the fortunes
of war seemed to be in favor of the
British. For him, men who readily changed
sides "have given proof of a treacherous disposition,
and who are bound to us by no
motives of attachment." Washington's view
of defectors changed when two young
ensigns of Hessian regiments, Carle Friedrich
Fuhrer and Carl Wilhelm Kleinschmidt
—38—
_______________________Wust
convinced him of their enthusiasm for the
American cause. He supported their plan to
organize a separate corps of deserters and
prisoners of war in a letter to Congress on
August 18, 1778. Eleven days later
Congress resolved, 'That a new corps of
troops be raised by the name of the German
volunteers, to consist of such deserters from
the foreign troops as shall be disposed freely
to enlist therein." Both ensigns were to be
given "for the present the pay of captains in
the service of the United States...."19
Washington had been impressed by
Fuhrer's attitude and he had received good
reports about him from Virginia. The bright
young man had been taken prisoner at
Trenton in December 1776, where he
received a personal parole. Fuhrer spent
most of the time in Dumfries, a seaport in
Virginia, until a prisoners' exchange was
negotiated in 1778. When he and Kleinschmidt
were returned to their regiments in
New York, they applied immediately for
permission to resign their commission,
which was granted on condition that they
should not enlist in American forces.
Unwilling to submit to this restriction, they
hired horses and crossed over to the
American lines at White Plains on August
7th. They expressed their motivation while
claiming that they had not deserted as prisoners
but waited until they could resign
their commissions in a public statement. In it
they also stated:
Whenever a Prince undertakes to sell
his Subjects to a Foreign Power for
infamous and wicked purposes,
without their knowledge or consent,
we are of the opinion, such subjects
have a right to vacate the contract as
soon as opportunity offers.20
The recruiting efforts of the two officers
turned out to be a failure. A number of
Hessian, Braunschweig and Ansbach soldiers
volunteered but not enough to make a
separate corps a reality. Some, like Fuhrer
himself, were assigned to the Pulaski
Legion, others to Armand's Legion. A former
Prussian officer, Major Bartholimew
Van Heer, organized a band of light dragoons
as a provost guard which consisted
largely of Germans, including deserted
Ansbachers and Hessians. It became
Washington's mounted bodyguard and
served as such until the end of the war.
There were also German deserters in state
and local militia units. Fuhrer himself
returned to Virginia, where he was offered a
position with the state cavalry and promoted
to the rank of major. Kleinschmidt, his
erstwhile companion, obviously had a
change of mind. In June 1780, he wrote to
his former Hessian commander asking for
forgiveness because-as he claimed- he had
been duped by Fuhrer, who had also cheated
him of his money. He never received a
reply and was last reported to have been
taken prisoner by the British at Yorktown.21
When the war ended, all those who had
been impressed by the obvious advantages
life in North America offered to the common
man and who had not defected had to
decide seriously whether they wanted to
stay or return home For those who had
wives and children it was a question of
whether they could find the means and
receive the permission to return to America
with their families afterwards. A few stayed
anyway. Daniel Arnd of the Ansbach-
Bayreuth troops took the oath of allegiance
in Winchester, Virginia, in June 1783, leaving
his wife alone in Ansbach. The Ansbach army
surgeon Sigismund Friedrich Arnold settled
in Nova Scotia, deserting his wife and his
daughter, who was born after he had left for
America.
—39—
Military Immigration______________
The commanders of the German subsidiary
troops now had to keep their units
together and, above all, gather up all those
who had been made prisoners and were
scattered on work assignments over a wide
area. The Americans had renewed the
inducements for those who wanted to stay.
They were given the choice of joining the
continental army or taking up farming on
200 acres of land with the gift of one cow
and two hogs. When there was not the
expected response, the Americans began to
charge them for food and lodging as long as
they did not return to their units for repatriation.
The Hessian high command made
considerable efforts to contact all prisoners
and supplied those they located with clothing
and money until their exchange could be
negotiated.
When the captive troops of Lord
Cornwallis' army were released and
marched toward Staten Island for embarkation,
240 men deserted along the way. A
last, vain attempt was made to gather
Hessians employed in New Jersey and
Pennsylvania, but soldiers who had been
indentured by local people were no longer
considered prisoners of war, and the
American War Council had no more jurisdiction
over them. The release depended on
the contractors and on the intention of the
soldiers. If the latter wanted to return to
Germany, a cash payment of thirty pounds
Pennsylvania currency per man was
required. The negotiations with ironmaster
Joh. Jacob Faesch at Mount Hope in New
Jersey, were particularly difficult. Faesch,
known as a hard taskmaster, refused to
release them at the end of the war because
he considered their indentures as civil contracts
which had to be fulfilled. Two of the
men had enough cash to pay Faesch and free
themselves, eight escaped and joined their
units in New York. The Hessian army
redeemed twenty-one men with cash. Only
six soldiers chose to remain at the iron
works. By August 12, 1783, the embarkation
date for the first contingents of the
Hessian army, no more efforts were made to
gather ex-prisoners.
There was no provision under which
the Hessian command could have legally
released any Hessian subjects from enlistment.
Article 13 of the subsidy treaty
expressly forbade any of them to settle in
America without the landgrave's approval.
As to subjects of other states in the Hessian
forces, soon after Yorktown Colonel
Ludwig von Wurmb suggested to the Kassel
authorities that they be allowed to stay in
America "if they so desire, otherwise they
will desert and take their rifles with them."
Wurmb saw good opportunities especially
for craftsmen. There is no record of any
official reaction to his proposal.22
A letter dated February 8, 1783, from
Duke Carl Wilhelm Ferdinand of Braunschweig
to the commander of his corps in
America reveals the rarely mentioned fact
that convicts had been included in the units.
Major General von Riedesel, who had been
given namelists of "delinquents and criminals"
when the troops embarked for
America, now was reminded that they were
to be "now and ever excluded" from the
return to the fatherland.23 The duke also
made it easier for others who wanted to
remain in North America, mainly because
he could not maintain so many troops at
home in peacetime. All those unfit for
future service were simply to be left behind.
Subjects of other states, both officers and
common soldiers were even to be encouraged
and given a bounty to settle in the
colonies remaining under the British crown.
—40—
_______________________Wust
Close to 600 Braunschweig soldiers availed
themselves of the opportunity in Canada.24
The regiment of Ansbach-Bayreuth
left 680 men behind, many of whom had
quit their units while they were prisoners in
Winchester, Virginia, and in Frederick,
Maryland. Captain Philipp von Molithor,
who had married an American woman without
the required approval of the margrave, was
placed under arrest but released once the
troops had embarked for Germany. He led a
group of discharged soldiers from various
German regiments who were moving to Nova
Scotia together with loyalists. Molitor
received 700 acres, the common soldiers
100 acres each in Annapolis county.25
The troops from Hessen-Hanau also
provided more than 400 settlers to the
remaining British colonies in 1783 after
having lost numerous deserters in the rebel
states. Colonel Joh. Christoph Lentz of the
Hanau Rangers wrote to his command in
July that he felt "honour bounds" to dismiss
all those who had joined under the promise
of settlement in North America before his
unit embarked for Europe. Many Hanauers
stayed in Quebec, but others took part in the
westward movement into Upper Canada.
Several of these ex-soldiers eventually went
south to areas in the United States where
they had established contacts earlier.
Captain Sigmund Hugget, a Hanau officer
from Colmar in Alsace, obtained an official
pass to move with his wife to the United
States.26
The decision was not easy for all men.
Hessian Lieutenant Karl Philipp von Krafft
was full of regrets when he had to prepare
for the home voyage: "My whole heart is
filled with sadness when I see fading from
my view the receding landmarks and house
tops in whose midst I leave my whole hap-
piness behind." Once back in Germany, he
obtained his discharge and returned to New
York to marry his sweetheart and settle for
good in America. The field surgeon Fetzer, a
native of Weingarten in Austria, was
already on board the transport vessel
Isabella in August 1783 when he decided at
the last minute to sneak back ashore and
remain in Quebec.
Army surgeons were obviously much
in demand in American and Canadian communities.
The regimental records of
Ansbach-Bayreuth cite the desertion of
Friedrich Rapp and his servant in.
Philadelphia. Rapp settled in Germantown
and married a local woman. The Hessian
field surgeon Philipp Klipstein from
Darmstadt opened a successful medical
practice in Winchester, Virginia. No fewer
than thirty-six such surgeons made Canada
their new home and several of them became
versatile physicians. A number of ex-soldiers
with some education became schoolmasters
like Wilhelm Heyden in the town of
Frederick, Maryland, or Philipp Goldeiss,
who conducted the Lutheran parochial
school on Mill Creek in the Virginia frontier
country. Hessian ensign Spangenburg, one
of the Yorktown prisoners, settled down in
eastern Virginia with his American wife and
soon was known for giving Latin lessons.
Another Hessian officer, Philip Reinhold
Pauly of Magdeburg, was hired as a French
and Latin teacher in Philadelphia at the new
university before he entered the Reformed
ministry.
Corporal Joh. Henrich Giese of the
Hessian Crown Prince regiment, a native of
Lichtenau in Hessen educated at Hersfeld
Latin School, was a student at Marburg
University when he joined the Americabound
troops. In February 1782, he was per-
—41
Military Immigration______________
suaded by Reformed communicants in
Frederick, Maryland, to go into the ministry
since many churches were without pastors.
Giese began preaching to four Reformed
congregations in nearby Loudoun county in
Virginia and remained in America after the
war. Another Hessian corporal, Theophil
Emanuel Frantz of Stettin in Pommerania,
was licensed by the Lutheran Ministerium
in October 1778, but he was unable to get a
congregation because "the people consider
him to be crazy and non compos mentis."
Joh. Georg Hoehl, a private of the Ansbach
troops from near Nordlingen in Franconia,
began preaching on his own for pastorless
Lutheran congregations in western
Maryland and Virginia. The Pennsylvania
Ministerium turned him down after the
results of his examination were considered
"too poor for a common country schoolmaster."
27
There were also real ministers who chose
to remain in America. Chaplain Joh.
Christoph Wagner of the Bayreuth regiment
was promised a position as pastor in
Maryland, where he had been in captivity.
When his unit was freed and ready to return
to Europe, Wagner stayed behind in
Frederick, but by July 1783 he decided to
join the loyalists and moved to Nova Scotia,
where he was assigned 400 acres of land.
Friedrich Valentin Melsheimer, a graduate
of Helmstedt University, came in 1776 as
the chaplain of the Braunschweig Dragoon
regiment. He was taken prisoner in August
1777 and exchanged for a captured
American chaplain in May 1779. In his own
words he explained that he did not return to
the regiment "on account of some difficulties
I had with brother officers, I resigned my
commission as chaplain and assumed
charge of several congregations in
Lancaster county." Frederick Muhlenberg, a
member of the Continental Congress in
March 1780 called, Melsheimer "a true
Friend of American Liberty." This was the
beginning of a long career as a Lutheran
minister in Pennsylvania coupled with a
systematic study of minerals plants and
insects, earning him, the designation as "the
father of American entomology."28
Among the participants in this unique
chapter of German emigration were men
trained in many crafts for which there was a
need in American communities. A large
number came from rural backgrounds,
which gave them an appreciation for the
land that was offered to them. Certainly
there were some charlatans and crooks
among them. Many a peacetime emigrant
transport brought such people along with all
the good ones. Almost every state of the
new United States became the borne of exsoldiers.
Compared with the conditions in
Germany, the free atmosphere of the still
British colonies to the north likewise proved
attractive enough to many hundreds of
them.
Joh. Henrich Reuter of Hasselbach in
Wittgenstein sent his first letter home from
Halifax, Nova Scotia, on October 30, 1783:
"I am now a free man, free from soldier's
life after eight years, and I am resolved to
remain in this country because as a sergeant I
have been promised two hundred morgens of
land." While he mentions other assistance
the colony was offering, he expresses the
wish "to have you, dear sisters and brothers
or some of my friends here with me because I
would be able to feed them here on my
land." In a letter from Savannah, Georgia,
the Hessian veteran Justus Hartmann
Scheuber wrote to his former chief,
Friedrich von der Malsburg: "How happy I
and others are who have left the
42
_______________________Wust
slavish spirit for republican and democratic
angels."29
Another group of people associated
with the troops was described in a letter
Rebecca Samuel, the wife of a Jewish
watchmaker in Petersburg, Virginia, sent to
her parents in Hamburg: "you cannot imagine
what kind of Jews they have here. They were
all German itinerants who made a living by
hawking in Germany. They came to America
during the war, as soldiers and now they
wouldn't recognize themselves." Indeed, it
took not very long for many of them to
prosper. Joseph Darmstadt, a sutler with the
Hessian troops became a very successful
merchant in Richmond and was soon elected
to the city council. Philipp Mark, a native of
Waldeck who converted to Protestantism,
came to America as quartermaster of the
Third Waldeck regiment. In 1783 he opened
his own export-import business in New York
and soon became active in the local German
Society which had been founded after the
war to assist newly arrived emigrants.30
The exact number of German soldiers
and their camp followers who remained in
North America cannot be ascertained.
Estimates based on official records in the
six principalities which furnished troops
range from, 5,500 to 6,500 persons.
On the American side of the war there
were a few unemployed officers from
Germany who were accepted by the
Continental Congress from among a considerable
number of military professionals who
were seeking jobs. Foremost among them
was Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben who
had left the Prussian service in 1763 and
taken on a position as chamberlain for the
prince of Hohenzollern-Hechingen which
he gave up in 1774. After much futile
searching for a military position befitting
his prior experience, Steuben's attention
was directed toward the American cause.
He arrived during the first week of
December 1777 at Portsmouth, New
Hampshire, on a clandestine French armament
transport and was subsequently
appointed Inspector General of the
American army with the rank of major general.
Steuben made the new republic his
home after the war.31 Among the very few
other German officers who stayed on and
became citizens was Heinrich Emanuel
Lutterloh whose application to serve in the
continental army had been approved by the
American commissioners in Paris in 1777.
Lutterloh's services turned out to be erratic.
He resigned as assistant quartermaster in
1778 but seems to have later been used in
the supply corps,
After France concluded a treaty of
alliance with the United States on March 20,
1778, American hopes for the active participation
of French troops against the British
were high. It was, however, not until July
1780 that the first units of the expeditionary
forces under Count Rochambeau landed at
Newport, Rhode Island, after successfully
crossing an Atlantic swarming with British
warships. Among Rochambeau's army was
the regiment Royal Deux-Ponts, a unit
which the ruler of the Duchy of Zweibrucken
had placed at the disposal of the
King of France as far back as 1756. There
were some Germans in other regiments.
Together with German-speaking soldiers
from Lorraine, Alsace and Switzerland, the
German element of the entire French expeditionary
force in America represented at
least one-third of the total. In contrast to the
German auxiliary troops of the British,
these soldiers did not come as enemies.
While their reception was friendly every-
—43—
Military Immigration______________
where, the appearance of a regiment from
the Palatinate in areas settled by Germans,
many of whom from the Duchy of
Zweibrucken, caused much excitement and
delight both among the soldiers and among
the local population. Private Georg Flohr, a
native of Sarnstall near Annweiler in the
Palatinate, vividly described in his diary the
encounter when the troops reached
Pennsylvania early in September 1781.
Near the Delaware, at Grandfort, "here we
met German people for the first time who
welcomed us on the road as fellow-countrymen."
Closer to Philadelphia,
there we were met by a crowd of
German inhabitants from the city
who were looking for compatriots
and for acquaintances because they
had heard that the Zweibrucken regiment
was to be there. In our ranks
there really was no lack of such
countrymen since it is no exaggeration
to state that one third of the regiment
met people here from home;
among them there were very many
brothers and sisters who met and
who had not seen one another for
many years since they left in their
youth to go to this New Land.
In this manner many a soldier also
met his father etc. Some had left
their children behind in Europe
when they fled to this country
because they had gone into bankruptcy.
When the regiment set up its camp near
the city,
within half an hour so many people
gathered that it looked tike the
largest country fair in front of the
camp but all tents were also crowded,
one had his brother there, another one
his sister, a third one his friends etc.
On the 4th there was even a larger
throng than before because country
folk came from up to 10-12 hours
away in order to look for familiar
faces which they found aplenty.
Flohr continues his description of this
"homecoming" with a mention of the need of
the local Germans for information from their
native land from which communications had
been interrupted for several years by the war.
They wanted to know if friends and relatives
were still alive. Any Zweibrücken soldier
who ventured into Philadelphia was taken by
his countrymen to the nearest inn and treated
generously as long as he was willing to talk.
Such contacts with the local population
worried the officers. For the first months after
arrival, the French had tried very hard to keep
the soldiers away from civilians but, after all,
they had come as allies and had to accept the
kindness and enthusiasm of the Americans.
Most of the soldiers under French command
had signed up for eight years of service
before there was any hint of their being used
overseas. Of 316 deserters from Rochambeau's
corps, the Zweibrucken regiment
accounted for 104, almost one-third of the
total. Thirty-three of them left their units
during the five months prior to the embarkation
which took place from Providence, Rhode
Island, for the West Indies in December 1782.
Private Flohr noted that some Americans had
promised to hide defectors "until the French
were gone." The French had sentenced five
recaptured deserters to immediate execution in
order to set an example. Those who left the
troops before their enrolment contract had
expired were also punished by the confiscation
of all their property and inheritance at
home.32 Among those of Rochambeau's corps
who remained in America was the army
doctor Franz Joseph Mettauer, a native of
Sulzbach in Alsace. Others returned with their
regiment and as soon as they obtained a dis-
_______________________Wust
charge headed for America. In September
1784, Father Paul Rignatz, a native of
Wurzburg and Catholic chaplain of the regiment
Deux-Ponts, arrived in Baltimore on
his own and reported immediately to the
Prefect Apostolic, John Carrol.
Georg Flohr, whose journal of the
American experiences described the
impressions of a young man raised in a remote
Palatine village, did not return to
America until more than ten years later.
After he witnessed the violent turn of events
of the French Revolution in Paris, Flohr
decided to go to the Robinson valley in
Virginia, where several Germans lived who
had fought alongside the French corps. He
taught school there and studied for the
Lutheran ministry under Pastor Wilhelm
Zimmermann. For thirty years afterwards
Flohr was the leading Lutheran clergyman
in southwest Virginia.
The effect on so many Germans on
both sides of the conflict having seen the
well-being and personal freedom of their
countrymen was to be felt in most areas to
which veterans returned.
— Klaus Wust New
York City
—45—
—46—
1
Rodney Atwood, The Hessians: Mercenaries from
Hessen-Kassel in the American Revolution
(Cambridge, 1980), 10, 24-25.
2
Ulrich Weiss, "Ein Wittgensteiner Regiment?,"
Wittgenstein 47 (1983), 126-128.
3
Atwood, 25-26.
4
Proceedings and Debates of the British Parliaments
1754-1783 Respecting North America, ed. R.
C. Simmons & P. D. G. Thomas, 6 (White
Plains, NY: 1987), 409-410.
5
Horst Dippel, Germany and the American
Revolution, 1770-1800 (Chapel Hill, NC:
1977), 128.
6
Staatsbote (Philadelphia) Jan. 5 & May 7, 1776.
7
Lyman H. Butterfield, "Psychological Warfare in
1776: The Jefferson-Franklin Plan to Cause
Hessian Desertions," Proceedings of the
American Philosophical Society, XCIV (1950),
No,2, 233-241; Atwood, 186-187.
8
Ernst Kipping, The Hessian View of America, 1776-
/7&?(Monmouth Beach, NJ: 1971), 9.
9
Johann Gottfried Seume, Mein Leben (Bremen,
1969), 51-52.
10
Kipping, 10, 24, 40-45; Atwood, 191, 199-201.
"Clifford Neil Smith, Brunswick Deserters
Immigrants of the American Revolution
(Thomson, IL: 1973); Atwood, 193-194.
12
Knyphausen's letter dated 6 July 1778. Staatsarchiv
Marburg 41, 410, No. 2, fol. 386
13
Kipping, 24.
14
Library of Congress (photostat) PreuBisches
Geheimes Staatsarchiv—Heeresarchiv Rep.
15A Ms. 382.
l5
Atwood, 192-193; Erhard Stadtler, Die Ansbach-
Bayreuther Truppen im Amerikanischen
Unabhaengigkeitskrieg, 1777-1783 (Nurnberg,
1956), 66-67.
16
Calendar of Virginia State Papers I (Richmond,
1875), 482-483.
l7
George F. Jones, "Georgia's German Language
Proclamation: An Appeal to the Hessians to
Desert," The Report 39 (1984), 21 -22.
18
Leslie to Clinton, dated 2 March 1782, The Report
39 (1984), 26-27; August Woringer, "Protocol
der Amtshandlungen, die der Feldprediger G.
C. Coster verrichtet," Deutsch-Amerikanische
Geschichts-Blatter 20-21 (1920-1), 281, 286-
287, 289, 292.
l9
(Worthington C. Ford, ed.) The Writings of George
Washington (New York: 1889-1903), XI, 81,
98-99.
20
Pennsylvania Packet, 24 December 1778.
21
Atwood, 202.
22
Stadtler, 152; Atwood, 10-11, 189; Kipping, 36.
23
Gunter Moltmann, "Die Transportation von
Straflingen," Deutsche Amerikaauswanderung
des 19. Jahrhunderts (Stuttgart: 1976), 171.
24
Virginia DeMarce, German Military Settlers in
Canada after the American Revolution (Sparta,
WA: 1984), 3.
25
Stadtler, 26, 71-73, 151.
26
Pages 89-91 in H.W. Debor, "German Soldiers of the
American War of Independence as Settlers in
Canada," German-Canadian Yearbook 111
(1976), 71-93.
27
DeMarce, 8, 11, 19; Atwood, 198, 204; Stadtler,
73, 151, 160, 166; HETRINAHessische
Truppen im amerikanischen Unabhangigkeitskrieg
(Inge Auerbach & Otto Frolich, eds.) III
(1976), #5984, #10951; IV (1976), #2371.
28
Charles H. Glatfelter, Pastors and People
(Breiningsville, PA, 1980) I, 55, 87-88.
29
Wittgenstein 47 (1983), 122-123; Dippel, 341.
30
Dated 12 January 1791 in Jacob Rader Marcus,
American Jewish. Documents—Eighteenth
Century (Cincinnati, OH: 1959), 51-54; Klaus
Wust, The Virginia Germans (Charlottesville,
VA: 1969), 104; Albert W. Haarman, "The Third
Waldeck Regiment in British Service," Journal
of the Society for Army History Research 48
(1970), 182-185.
31
Edith von Zemensky & Morgan H. Pritchett,
"Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben: Soldier of
Fortune or Military Professional?," The Report
36(1975), 8-25.
32
Ernst Drumm, Das Regiment Royal-Deuxponts
(Zweibrucken, 1936); Rudolph Karl Tross, "Zu
Wasser und zu Land: Die Erlebnisse des Georg
Flohr im Hochloblichen Regiment von
Zweybrucken," Pfalzischer Merkur, 1 & 2
September 1976; Robert A. Selig, "A German
Soldier in America, 1780-1783: The Journal of
Georg Daniel Flohr," The William and Mary
Quarterly, 3rd Series, vol. L, no. 3 (1993), 575-
590.
Notes
Military Immigration, Notes__________
—48
http://www.purepage.com