![]() DIETER CUNZ HALL OF LANGUAGES
IN COLUMBUS, OHIO
Courtesy: Ohio State Monthly
The Dieter Cunz Hall of Languages is one of the newest buildings on the
Ohio State University campus. Located directly west of the William Oxley
Thompson Library, it was erected at a cost of $2,203,000. The four-story
structure is designed to house the East Asian, Classical, Romance, German
and Slavic language departments as well as the Linguistic and Comparative
Literature departments.
![]() DIETER CUNZ
(1910-1969)
TRIBUTES AND MEMORIES
The sudden death of Dr. Dieter Cunz, Professor and Chairman of
the Department of German of Ohio State University, on February
17th, 1969, was a great shock for the members of the Society for the
History of the Germans in Maryland. It left an irreplaceable gap in
the ranks of the Society.
Dr. Cunz was born August 4, 1910, in Hoechstenbach, Germany.
He grew up and attended school in Wiesbaden. He studied at the
universities of Munich, Leipzig, Koenigsberg and Frankfurt. From
Frankfurt he received his Ph. D. in 1934 in the fields of German Liter-
ature and History.
A dedicated opponent of Hitler and his regime, he left his native
country in 1934 and lived in Switzerland as a free lance writer and
contributor to Swiss newspapers. In 1938 he emigrated to the United
States. After a year in New York City, he moved to Baltimore, where
he received a scholarship from the Carl Schurz Memorial Foundation
for work in the archives and the library of the Society for the History
of the Germans in Maryland. In the same year he started his teaching
career at the University of Maryland at College Park, where he rose
within nine years from the rank of assistant instructor to professor.
He taught at this institution until 1957, when he joined the Ohio
State University as professor and chairman of its Department of
German.
Dr. Cunz was a devoted teacher, who enjoyed the respect and love
of his students. In 1961 the Arts College Student Council awarded
him its Good Teaching Award, and in 1964 he received the Alfred J.
Wright Award for "dedicated service to student activities and student
organizations."
Dr. Cunz was a specialist in the field of 18th century German
Literature, but his most important and lasting contribution to scholar-
[9 ]
ship was his work on the history of German immigration to the United
States. His book The Maryland Germans, A History (Princeton Uni-
versity Press, 1948) established him as one of the two or three leading
scholars in the field of immigration history both here and abroad. With
the last of his many books he returned again to the field of German
immigration history, a collection of literary portraits of famous German
immigrants, They Came from Germany (Dodd, Mead, and Co,, New
York, 1966) for young readers. He contributed close to a hundred
major articles and essays to periodicals and newspapers in this country
as well as in Germany, Switzerland and France. He was also the
co-author of German for Beginners, a textbook widely used in American
and Canadian colleges and universities.
These scholarly activities earned him the highest recognition both
here and abroad. He was on the board of directors of the Carl Schurz
Memorial Foundation (1961 to 1965) and an honorary member of the
Society for the History of the Germans in Maryland, whose secretary
he had been from 1944 to 1956 and whose publication The Report he
had edited for many years. In 1959 the government of the Federal
Republic of Germany bestowed upon him the Order of Merit, First
Class " in recognition of his efforts on behalf of the German language
instruction in the United States and his scholarly contributions in the
field of German-American immigration history." In 1965 the Ohio
State chapter of Phi Beta Kappa elected him to honorary membership.
Dr. Cunz was a member of the Modern Language Association of
America, the American Association of Teachers of German, the Ohio
Historical Society, the American Lessing Society and the Ohio College
Association. He often held administrative positions in these organi-
zations.
At the meeting of the Executive Committee of the Society for the
History of the Germans on March 17th, 1969, the Board passed the
resolution that the sincere expression of the Society's realization of
the great loss sustained be inscribed upon the minutes of the Executive
Committee.
* * *
His youth falls in the difficult years of World War I. His secondary
educationGymnasium in Wiesbaden, 1920-1929in the years of eco-
nomic depression and political unrest of the twenties. During his
university years the political sky grew " browner and browner " and
ever more menacingly which was depressing and painful to anyone
who like Dieter Cunz firmly believed in the democratic form of
government.
When in 1933 the Nazi curtain descended upon Germany Dieter
Cunz, whose political ideas were well known in university circles,
received a " grace period " to enable him to bring his doctoral studies
to completion. This he accomplished in 1934 and with it his stay in
Germany drew to a close. An uncertain future had to be faced.
The departure from his native Germany was a sad and agonizing
experience. Dieter Cunz was deeply attached to his family, particu-
[10]
larly to his mother, a very intelligent, hard working and deeply
religious person, he had deep roots in his beloved Rhineland. It was a
moving experience when, in 1953, Dieter Cunz drove me to Schierstein
near Wiesbaden where his father had been pastor for many years. On
this personally conducted tour I was introduced to many corners and
nooks in the parsonage, to the surrounding garden and to the adjacent
Rhine river. In the course of this visit Dieter Cunz related, in his
charming way, fond memories of his youth and adolescence deeply
embedded in his heart and mind.
The years of exile in Switzerland which followed were hard and
bitter. The dreadful events in Nazi Germany were a source of perma-
nent anxiety and depression. At the same time his own existence was
most precarious and in never-ending danger. As a foreigner he never
knew if the Swiss authorities would grant him the residence permit
which had to be renewed every six months. His financial position was
close to catastrophic. There was, for a German refugee, no hope at all
that he would be allowed to accept a job that could provide even a
minimum subsistence. He had to earn his living, and what meagre
living it was!, as a free lance writer, contributing to Swiss newspapers,
giving tutorial lessons to high school students who needed help in some
subjects, publishing occasionally a short story that just brought in
enough to pay for the next three meals. And still, he was undaunted.
Actually, some of his most playful and carefree works were the result
of these dark and insecure years, a collection of stories under the title
Um uns herum, fairy-tales from everyday life. They were read with
delight by adults and juveniles alike, and to him they meant regular
meals for about four months.
By the end of 1937 it was obvious that his hopes to find permanent
refuge in Switzerland would never materialize. And at this darkest
moment something like a miracle occurred. A very remote relative in
America, who had heard of Dieter's plight, came to his rescue and
provided him with the necessary papers to emigrate to America. He
arrived in New York in August 1938, financially just as insecure as
he had been the last 4 years in Switzerland, but at least knowing that
there was a place from which he could not be expelled, and the chance
of a job if he were lucky enough to find one in these difficult post-
depression years. He did practically anything that happened to come
along, he wrote occasional pieces for the New York Times Book Re-
view, he still reported on cultural happenings in the United States for
some Swiss newspapers. And this in addition to learning and perfecting
his English, spending long and patient hours in the reading room of
the New York Public Library, where he could read English books,
English periodicals without paying for it. It was already here, in the
friendly shelter of the New York Public Library, that his interest in
the interrelationship between the United States and Germany, in the
German emigration to the shores of the New World, developed.
What he read and studied there in order to improve his English
was, after all, his own story: the story of an exile who had had to leave
his native land, and who found a home, a friendly place on the other
side of the ocean. Whatever he did in the following years to the end
[11]
of his life, his great achievements as a scholar and a teacher he con-
sidered his paying back his debt to America, to the country which had
received him gladly and permitted him to develop his extraordinary
gifts.
AUGUSTUS
J. PRAHL
University of Maryland
* * *
The Germania Club of Baltimore celebrated its 100th anniversary
in 1940. About the end of 1938 I wrote to Henry L. Mencken, who was
a member of the Germania Club, to inquire whether he would be in-
clined to write a short history of this venerable organization. In his
reply Mencken said that he would rather not write such a history and
pointed out to me that this club represented only a very small part
of the history of the Germans in Baltimore and Maryland which should
soon be written by someone really competent. I gave this letter to
Karl A. M. Scholtz who was then the chairman of the executive com-
mittee of the Society for the History of the Germans in Maryland.
Mr. Scholtz and I lunched together regularly and on occasion I
had slightly criticised him for spending some of the income from the
Ferdinand Meyer legacy for prizes given to high school students as a
reward for German compositions. When I handed Mencken's letter
to him, I commented: " There is your project for spending Ferdinand
Meyer's legacy."
Somewhat later, Karl Scholtz informed me that Professor A. E.
Zucker of the University of Maryland in College Park had reported
to the executive committee meeting of the SHGM that a young Ger-
man instructor in his department would be able and willing to do the
necessary research for a comprehensive history of the Maryland Ger-
mans. Then I told Karl Scholtz that we could try out the ability of
this German instructor by letting him write the history of the Germania
Club first. This apparently appealed to Karl Scholtz and some weeks
later he told me that Dr. Dieter Cunz would write the history of the
Germania Club in time for the 100th anniversary and that the cost of
the research and printing would be covered by the Ferdinand Meyer
Fund.
Then this young teacher set to work. During the seven long years
of his research in Baltimore all of us who were involved in German
organizations and churches learned to know and appreciate this dedi-
cated scholar: Dieter Cunz. As Professor Zucker wrote in a tribute
in the Washington Journal last Spring: " The grant offered by the
Society was meagre and the age of Zwingli quite distant from that of
Mencken and Mergenthaler but Dr. Cunz accepted it gratefully. It
is simply admirable how fast and how thoroughly this European became
familiar with the history of the State of Maryland. And not alone with
Maryland. He saw everything within the framework of the history
of the State and of the Nation as a whole, never as isolated events."
That is how Dr. Dieter Cunz set out on his career as a historian
in the United States. For him the slim booklet commemorating the
[12 ]
centenary of the Germania Club was, as he told Klaus Wust some
years ago, his Gesellenstück. For us in Baltimore, in Maryland, the
coming of Dieter Cunz was the fulfillment of the vision the founders
of the Society for the History of the Germans in Maryland had long
ago: a history of the German element which would place its achieve-
ments squarely into the background of our State at large.
OTTO
H. FRANKE
Baltimore, Maryland
Dieter Cunz's contact with the National Carl Schurz Association
(originally the Carl Schurz Memorial Foundation) goes back at least
as far as 1939, when the Society for the History of the Germans in
Maryland received a grant from the Oberlaender Trust of the Carl
Schurz Memorial Foundation to help finance his research for his pioneer
work, The Maryland Germans. Over the years there were other grants
because the Board of Directors was profoundly impressed by his
ability as a historian, and his enthusiasm for and understanding of the
broad field of Americana-Germanica. He was one of the first writers
to describe the German immigration in the context of the sociological
pattern of the country, appreciating the work of the " little " people
as well as the great, in the interaction of all elements of the population.
He did not distort the historical picture by treating his people as
though they lived and worked in a sociological vacuum.
It was Dieter Cunz and A. E. Zucker who first told me about the
Carl Schurz Memorial Foundation in Philadelphia while I was still
doing graduate work at the University of Maryland. Therefore, two
years later, when I began to work on the staff of the American-German
Review, naturally I turned to these two men for suggestions and
material. Dr. Cunz had already written nine articles for the magazine,
dealing mostly with early German settlers and craftsmen, and he wrote
another seven while I was active on the editorial staff. Always they
were informative and written in a readable style, evoking the atmo-
sphere of the times.
But besides the articles he himself wrote, there were several that he
inspired: I am thinking of one by Dr. Wolfgang Fleischhauer, and
several by Klaus Wust. In addition to these there was, of course, the
Bibliography Americana-Germanica which the American-German Re-
view printed annually from the list compiled by Dr. Cunz.
Dieter Cunz was a dedicated historian and was not happy when the
emphasis of our magazine shifted to the contemporary scene. I was
sorry about his feeling that we had deserted his field, but had the
impression in the last few months that he understood the reasons for
the shift in emphasis, even though he may not have agreed with it.
When Dr. Cunz came to Philadelphia he often telephoned me and
we would meet for lunch or dinner. He was interested in the develop-
ment of the magazine and the organization, and tried to help us reach
a wider group of people, for he was eager to document the contribution
[13]
the Germans made to our country. One of his special interests was
Charles Follen, on whom he wrote an article for us commemorating
the hundredth anniversary of his death. He had wanted to write an
account of the years in Switzerland before this firebrand came to the
U.S., but never had the opportunity to pursue the sources he had
uncovered years before.
The year when I had the closest and most continuous contact with
Dr. Cunz was just before the publication of his Maryland book. His
humor, kindness, thoughtfulness and his thorough scholarship were
never more in evidence than then, even though the pressure of dead-
lines was great. It was a real pleasure and a rich experience for me,
and was the basis of our friendship and understanding.
ALICE
H. FINCKH
National Carl Schurz Association
Philadelphia
* * *
I was introduced to Dieter Cunz shortly after his arrival in the
United States by my friend, Professor Ernst Feise of The Johns Hop-
kins University, who did so much to help scholars who left Germany
during the Hitler years. I saw Dr. Cunz very seldom, but we corre-
sponded rather frequently because of our common interest in the
history of immigration. Though trained in German literature and
culture in German universities, Cunz soon established a reputation in
the United States by his publications in the field of immigration. At
the time of his death he was chairman of the large department of
German at The Ohio State University.
During his period of service as a professor of German at the Uni-
versity of Maryland, Dr. Cunz edited the annual publications of the
Society for the History of the Germans in Maryland. The Society's
publication The Report runs back over more than three quarters of
a century. In the heyday of German immigration to the United States
there were a large number of German-American journals. To-day the
Maryland journal is the only one that has survived, and it is no
exaggeration to say that in these later years which were particularly
difficult for America's Deutschtum, much of the credit must be given
to Dr. Cunz.
In addition to his editorial labors and short articles, Dr. Cunz was
the author of three major works, The Maryland Germans: A History,
Egg Harbor City: New Germany in New Jersey, and the third, and
more popular, a collection of biographical essays on the careers of
leading German-Americans, They Came From Germany, the Stories
of Famous German Americans (New York, 1966).
The volume on the Maryland Germans was the product of long
and painstaking research in genealogical and church records, news-
papers, letters and other historical source material. The result is a
"case history" of a single state which could serve as a model for
studies of other states. It is entirely objective and while it does full
[ 14 ]
justice to the Germans it avoids the filio-pietistic exaggerations of
many of the earlier books on ethnic elements in the American popu-
lation.
The story of Egg Harbor deals with an experiment by a number
of Germans to build a model German community in New Jersey.
Here Germans were to transplant and enjoy the " gemütlich " social
life of the old country, with German schools, newspapers, singing
societies, lodges and Turnvereine. The United States once had scores
of immigrant Utopias, but only a few survived into the present century.
Egg Harbar was no exception. It developed, in the free atmosphere
of the United States, into just another American bilingual community.
Dr. Cunz will be remembered in the profession as a careful, thorough
scholar who made a significant contribution to the history of immigra-
tion. He was always ready to cooperate with other scholars. He was
generous in his judgments and unduly humble about his own achieve-
ments.
CARL WITTKE
Case Western Reserve
University
* * *
The first time I met Dieter Cunz was in December of 1947 in
Zurich, Switzerland, while I was studying as an independent student
at the University. Little did I realize the significance of this meeting
for my own future. Dr. A. E. Zucker, then Head of the Department
of Foreign Languages at the University of Maryland, recommended
that I get in touch with Dieter so that I might plan with him to fulfill
the requirements for a Ph. D. in Germanics.
It was a propitious meeting. Dieter not only helped me immedi-
ately in planning a course of study, he also proposed a topic for the
dissertation. In addition, as a friend, he helped to effect a smooth tran-
sition for me and my family from Zurich to College Park, even to the
extent of permitting me to use his apartment in his absence from the
campus.
The topic for my dissertation presented certain difficulties. Otto
von Corvin, although a forty-eighter, did not appear in his best light
as the author of Der Pfaffenspiegel, and copies of his other works were
hard to come by. A perusal of Die Geissler did little to convert me.
I demurred, but Dieter encouraged me to withhold judgment until
some of Corvin's other works had been reviewed. He still thought it
wise for me to limit myself to the examination of one man's life and
works rather than attempt a study of the effect America had had on
German literature! I learned my first lesson in research.
Actually, it turned out that Der Pfaffenspiegel was not so much a
scurrilous work as it was an attempt to discredit certain forces which
appeared to Corvin to uphold the established order and to oppose
social and political progress. It is doubtful that the book would have
been written had Corvin not had this conviction.
[ 15]
It was not always easy to please Dieter. He was an exacting
teacher. Some chapters had to be revised and other rewritten, always
for good cause. Each assertion required documentation. In the end,
Dieter's tutelage had its effect. The dissertation was completed in near
record time, and Otto von Corvin turned out to be not only a staunch
supporter of the Revolution of 1848-49, but even more significantly
for me, a forgotten friend of America. With Dieter's encouragement,
an article in the American-German Review (XX, No. 6) followed
the dissertation.
Somewhat later the article on Corvin was followed by a second
article. This one, somewhat further afield, was on the German Teacher
Exchange Program, a program conducted by the U. S. Office of Edu-
cation in cooperation with the Department of State. By this time my
own rediscovery of America through the eyes of Otto von Corvin had
led me to accept a position with the Government which gave me an
opportunity to arrange programs and activities designed to help
interpret America to German teachers visiting the United States on
the exchange program. Once started on this path, it was only a matter
of time before my interest in interpreting America grew to include
not only teachers from Germany, but also those from the developing
countries. This brought me to the International Cooperation Admin-
istration, later the Agency for International Development. And still
Dieter's example of research and publication inspired me. I wrote
additional articles on subjects germane to international educational
development.
Finally, using techniques of the master teacher, I undertook to
chronicle the epic immigration in the early 1850's of an unknown,
God-fearing German family. Although the story is not yet completed,
the continuing influence of Dieter Cunz will, I am sure, help me to
bring the work to a successful completion. The memory of Dieter
Cunz for me transcends that of both friend and teacher.
MYRON
H. VENT
Education and Human
Resources Division,
Agency for International
Development
* * *
In the introduction of The Maryland Germans Dieter Cunz called
his major work a " case history " of American immigration, " the story
of a special group under special circumstances," but expressed the hope
"that from this special case some broader conclusions may be drawn
for immigration history in general." His hope was amply fulfilled.
Not only did his "case study" spark a renewed preoccupation with
German immigration in a number of States, it also provided guidelines
for the study of linguistic and cultural transition and integration by
researches of two decades. Considering the present state of the art
[16]
when ethnic distinctions are no longer viewed as being necessarily
un-American and the history of immigrant groups has ceased to be
the exclusive domain of ethnic apologists or grateful descendants, we
begin to comprehend the pioneer work that was done by Dieter Cunz
in the 1940's.
Leafing again through the pages of The Maryland Germans during
the first days after his death when newspapers quickly demanded an
appropriate Nachruf and the still incomprehensible news began to
force itself upon my mind as an irrevocable fact, I found numerous
passages revealing the character of the mentor and friend he had been
over the years. Almost twenty yearsever since I hitchhiked as a
student from Bridgewater to College Park for my first visit at 7501
Rhode Island Avenue. There is some of his guarded humor in examples
he chose to illustrate certain points. There is ample evidence of his
dogged determination to clear the historical records of legendary
accessories. His occasional impatience with narrow-mindedness found
expression in citing the name of the owner of a significant 18th century
newspaper file who was hiding it from researchers. All through the
book, he succeeded in maintaing historical objectivity without pre-
senting colorless or uncritical series of events. The biographical sketches
within the text, from Augustin Herrman to H. L. Mencken, are master-
ful as are, by the way, the concise biographies of noted German
Americans which Dieter Cunz contributed to the Brockhaus. The
reader is left with no doubt that the author personally felt much more
akin to the intellectually alert Liberals among the Baltimore Germans
than to the prodding, simple farm folks of Western Maryland. Yet,
rarely had the settlers of the backwoods found such comprehening
treatment by a historian.
And a historian Dieter Cunz remained at heart. He was ever on
the alert for new material, a hint, an inkling of a source here or there
his friends all received notes from time to time on penny postcards or
on the back of a used file card together with a word of encouragement
when a long announced manuscript had not yet materialized.
His published writings contain little direct reference to himself.
Only at a symposium of German-language teachers on " Articulation
from High School to College " shortly before his death did he speak
about himself, tongue in cheek, yes, but also well aware how incon-
venient his counsel was to all who sought shortcuts in life and quick
solutions:
". . . others who know me will say, ' An old curmudgeon like you
will see to it that all the Christmas spirit is thoroughly demolished.
You will keep us aware that there are more difficulties than there
are solutions.'"
Or this passage:
" I am sceptical by nature; I hold dim views about the solvability
of the problem that is under discussion; I am the eternal sourpuss
flowers wilt when I enter the room and the milk of human
kindness curdles."
[ 17 ]
To which Professor George Metcalf replied: " All this I know very
well, and that is the very reason why I want you! " How true! With
the solicitous friend we lost our incorruptible critic whose counsel we
sought often and gladly. More than any verbose tributes, credit to
Dieter Cunz in footnotes of articles and monographs of years to come
will express what all of us owe him.
KLAUS WUST
Editor, The Report
[
18 ]
|